Down the Drain? (Featuring also an Unexpected Sexy Ending)

drain2.jpg

I have to confess you one thing. I am lazy. Really lazy. Everybody who knows me well enough can confirm. And, being lazy, I tend to postpone things. So, when I saw this article on the New York Times, I thought I should write a post on it. Only, since at the time I was busy, I postponed. Then, when I actually had the time, I delayed it again. Then I discovered that half the blogs in my blogroll had already posted about it. And, on top of that, in reality, I had already talked about the matter in this post, before the New York Times article was published. So, I decided to give it up. Even if, indeed, working at CERN and being the only blogger not writing about it was quite a shame. But, what the hell, why waste time on it, when there wasn’t much I could possibly add to dozens of other posts? (Did I tell you that I’m lazy, by chance?)

However, today I come across an aspect of the matter that I thought deserved a small effort. But you would have to wait until the end of the post to know it. Before that, I want just give you the useful pieces of information I wanted to publish in the first place.

No, the earth will not go down the drain of a black hole generated in the LHC. There are lots of reasons why it won’t happen. But the more basic one, and the easier to understand, is that particle collisions like the ones that will be obtained in the LHC (if we’ll make it work, which is another matter altogether…) are happening all the time around us, and had happened since quite some time already. Cosmic rays (in fact particles) with energies reaching values much higher than the LHC could ever dream to obtain, collide every day with protons and nuclei both on earth and other planets. The only reason to build LHC instead of studying these same events is this: Cosmic ray collisions have the somewhat irritating habit of happening all over the place, and not nicely pile up in a detector just to please a bunch of impatient physicists. Dirty little scoundrels that they are – the particles, I mean. Anyway, since the earth, the moon and other planets are still in their place since quite some time, we are safe (well, from this danger at least). Black holes, if ever they are created in particle collisions, either evaporate fast and nicely as this guy Hawking predicted, or interact so weakly as to pose no real threat.

I would add another useful bit of info as well. A short biography of Dr. Wagner, apparently written by himself as a host of this radio show:

Walter Wagner graduated UC Berkeley with a Minor in Physics, and a Major in Biology. Later, he discovered a novel particle in a balloon-borne cosmic ray detector, initially identified as a magnetic monopole. Though its identity remains uncertain, it is definitely not within the standard repertoire of known particles. After a three-year break from science to attend law school, Dr. Wagner resumed work in Physics and Biology at the US Veterans Administration Medical Center in San Francisco, working in Nuclear Medicine and Health Physics. He then embarked on teaching Science and Mathematics, from grade school to college. Dr. Wagner developed a botanical garden in Hawaii, and continues involvement with several professional associations, including Health Physics Society and Society of Nuclear Medicine.

So, a biologist, a physicist and a lawyer. I indeed have no problem to believe the world could be saved by a physicist. Or even, stretching a bit the imagination, by a biologist. But nobody can make me believe that the world could possibly be saved by a lawyer.

What about the peculiar aspect I mentioned at the beginning – you didn’t forget about it, right?

Well, the fact is that the good old New York Times, thanks to an unfortunate misspelling, had involuntarily given birth to a new category of porn, as documented for instance here (nice WordPress theme, by the way).

But if black holes could in theory be generated in LHC, I’m not quite sure I want to know what can be the outcome of a Large Hardon Collider.

PS: The image on top was linked in a comment on one of the blogs in my blogroll, actually in conjunction with the LHC black hole business. What is actually depicted there, where I did find it and which ones among the blogs I link have dealt with this matter is left as an exercise to the interested reader.

8 Responses to “Down the Drain? (Featuring also an Unexpected Sexy Ending)”

  1. thespode Says:

    Hey, thanks for the link!

  2. Well, I think “The Onion” could summarize this post as “Lazy CERN scientist with porn fantasies reassures the world that Large Hardon is safe”. ;-)

  3. I know, Caminadella, it’s way too easy to slander a poor guy on the web, these days.
    Maybe I should ask your dear friend Verde for a mutual letter of support…

  4. Roberto, don’t forget to mention the Large Hardon story when you write to Mr. Verde.

  5. So, porn black holes apart (as if the name itself isn’t enough)… what’s the photo? :-D

  6. It’s always funny how the outcome of a human experiment is considered “unnatural” (and hence dangerous in the mind of many) despite the fact that it merely replicates under controlled conditions a “natural” (and hence harmless) phenomenon.
    Quite the same thing happens in genetics and, to some extent, in artificial intelligence.

  7. Roberto Says:

    @ Mat/Tia: I should have let you search for the answer yourself, but I ‘ll be sympathetic to a fellow lazy guy. The photo depicts the largest drain hole in the world, at the Monticello Dam in California. See for instance:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monticello_Dam
    http://fogonazos.blogspot.com/2007/02/largest-drain-hole-ever.html
    http://www.trophybassonly.com/id56.htm
    Curiously, it is also known by the somewhat unfortunate name of “glory hole”. In case this does not ring any bell for you, ask Mr. Verde about the meaning.

    @ ENTJ: Yes, I agree. It even happened to me a few times, while discussing about clones, to hear phrases like ” human beings with exactly the same DNA, that’s against nature!” or,
    “a perfect copy of somebody, it’s scary”. Unfortunately, there never was a monozygotic twin present at the debate. Few people realize that “identical” twins are much more identical than clones could ever be to the original.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: